Informative+Paper



1. Is the title appealing? Why or why not? 2. What are the main ideas of the paper? 3. What is the evidence provided to support the main claim? 4. What are the positive values in the paper? 5. What are the strongest points? 6. What parts need more explanation or are not clear to you? 7. Did you knowledge and/or feelings change as you read? 8. What are some suggestions for improving the paper? 9. Are in-text citations in correct MLA format? Why or why not? 10. Is the Works Cited page in appropriate MLA format? Why or why not?

Kassidy Van Winkle - Peer Review questions

1. The title wasn't too apprealing to me, just because I know nothing about video games. 2. The main idea of the paper was informing the reader how video games shouldn't be looked down upon, there could potentially be valid reasons why children are so interested in it. 3. A lot of information was given to support the authors stand point. He gave statistics and it was obvious he had much prior knowledge of this topic. 4. All of the information given flowed smoothly together. 5. The strongest points were when he was giving his personal opinion on why he thinks video games aren't as bad as most say. 6. I feel he should have quoted more material outside of his own personal knowledge. 7. I felt more informed about this topic and how it probably should be taken more into consideration by the people who are against the claim that video games affect children as much as they say they do. 8. I suggest to incorporrate more language current to the authors age range. The wording sounds a bit mature. 9. No, he did not put quotations around the sentence in the paper. 10. Yes the work cited page is in correct format.